Comments on: Fallen Angel

By: CD

CD — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:53:03 +0000

You all nitpicked about the wrong thing. How about the misuse of “irony”? It’d be ironic if they decided against removing their wings and then they somehow had something bad happen to them BECAUSE of the wings. Not being able to fly after taking off your wings is about as ironic as an Alanis Morrisette song.

Like the comic.

By: Random Person #23414917823

Random Person #23414917823 — Sun, 24 May 2009 23:58:58 +0000

God is about Faith. Proving or disproving said entity’s existence is futile as it has nothing to do with logic.

By: Logic

Logic — Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:20:33 +0000

Me: Burden of proof is on the person claiming the existence of a given entity or idea.

No God is the default state. It is your job to prove that there is a God, not the atheist’s job to prove there isn’t.

By: Me

Me — Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:39:26 +0000

hey nemisis dude

prove that there’s no god

By: Tom

Tom — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:34:18 +0000

If they removed their wings, they’d transubstantiate into human beings, so you’re BOTH wrong! SO THERE!

By: Amuletts Nemesis

Amuletts Nemesis — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:43:10 +0000

Amulett,

I’m going to be one of those really annoying people who nitpick. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ANGELS, NOR IS THERE A GOD. So the argument is pointless you git.

By: amuletts

amuletts — Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:09:07 +0000

I’m going to be one of those really annoying people who nitpick. The angel on the head of a pin thing is a philosophical problem contemplating whether more than one angel can be in the same place at the same time, not that they are really tiny. That said, ignore it! ‘Cos this is hilarious!

By: J&M

J&M — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:33:24 +0000

Beautiful!

By: sylvain

sylvain — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:32:53 +0000

stupefying!