Nothing says “I love you” like a bouquet of Poop Blossoms.
4 Comments
I postulate that no rose would smell any less-sweet than the 2 Girls, 1 Cup variety.
In an axiomatic system with undefined terms, Rose, Smells Worse, and 2Girls1Cup, and has 2 axioms.
Axiom 1 states that for the set r of roses {R: R is all roses in existence} and any 2Girls1Cup G, G smells worse then r.
Axiom 2 states that if a 2Girls1Cup G smells worse then R, R does not smell worse then G.
Proof of the postulate that no rose smells worse then a 2Girls1Cup:
1: Suppose that there exists a rose R and a 2Girls1Cup G, where R smells worse then G.
2: R belongs to set r (Axiom 1).
3: R does not smell worse then G (Axiom 1).
4: G smells worse then R (Axiom 2).
5: Contradiction with hypothesis in step 1.
Simpsons did it!
this is one of my favorite comics simply because you made something we all laughed at when we were 5, poop, funny again.
4 Comments
I postulate that no rose would smell any less-sweet than the 2 Girls, 1 Cup variety.
In an axiomatic system with undefined terms, Rose, Smells Worse, and 2Girls1Cup, and has 2 axioms.
Axiom 1 states that for the set r of roses {R: R is all roses in existence} and any 2Girls1Cup G, G smells worse then r.
Axiom 2 states that if a 2Girls1Cup G smells worse then R, R does not smell worse then G.
Proof of the postulate that no rose smells worse then a 2Girls1Cup:
1: Suppose that there exists a rose R and a 2Girls1Cup G, where R smells worse then G.
2: R belongs to set r (Axiom 1).
3: R does not smell worse then G (Axiom 1).
4: G smells worse then R (Axiom 2).
5: Contradiction with hypothesis in step 1.
Simpsons did it!
this is one of my favorite comics simply because you made something we all laughed at when we were 5, poop, funny again.